Site Survey Report
Displayed below are the results of a desk-based assessment of the site's condition and survival. Users should note that this preliminary assessment, being based on digital aerial photography, may be inaccurate. A field survey will be required to confirm the site's true level of survival and heritage importance.
| Site Status : Main features unrecognisable - peripheral features visible | |
| Initial Overview | |
| Site Footprint Visible | Yes |
| Boundary Defined | Yes |
| Significant Development | No |
| Feature Richness Index | 2 |
| Architectual Features | |
| Principal Building | Yes |
| Garden Structures | No |
| Gateways and Gatehouses | No |
| Buildings of Indeterminate Purpose | No |
| Movement Within Site | |
| Entrances have changed | Yes |
| Drive position has changed | Yes |
| Avenues | No |
| Woodland Drives or Walks | No |
| Landscape Features | |
| Woodlands | No |
| Woodland Footprint Changed | No |
| Orchards | No |
| Parkland | No |
| Formal Garden | No |
| Kitchen / Walled and Productive Gardens | No |
| Vistas | No |
| Allees | No |
| Natural and Naturalistic Water Features | No |
| Artifical Water Features | No |
| Other Features | Yes |
| Comments | Two ring forts. |
| Section Comments | The path network shown on the 1836 - 1846 OS map suggests that the two ring forts were an integral part of the designed landscape of this site. Large modern agricultural buildings are visible in aerial photography within the core landscape. |
